“The most relevant agreement here - the Prime Video Terms of Use - is presented to consumers every time they buy digital content on Amazon Prime Video,” writes Biderman. In fact, all of the Prime Video content that Plaintiff has ever purchased remains available.”įurther, Amazon argues, the site’s required user agreements explain that some content may later become unavailable. “The Complaint points vaguely to online commentary about this alleged potential harm but does not identify any Prime Video purchase unavailable to Plaintiff herself. “Plaintiff claims that Defendant Amazon’s Prime Video service, which allows consumers to purchase video content for streaming or download, misleads consumers because sometimes that video content might later become unavailable if a third-party rights’ holder revokes or modifies Amazon’s license,” writes attorney David Biderman in the motion, which is posted below. On Monday, Amazon filed a motion to dismiss her complaint arguing that she lacks standing to sue because she hasn’t been injured - and noting that she’s purchased 13 titles on Prime since filing her complaint. ![]() Donald Trump Says Mar-a-Lago Home "Under Siege" as FBI Agents Raid Property
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |